0%

【LeetCode】Add Two Numbers

有感於自己是個廢物工程師,開了LeetCode帳號好幾個月一題都還沒刷,所以決定寫一系列紀錄自己刷LeetCode的過程跟解題方法,希望幾年後回頭能看見自己的進步,廢話不多說直接進入題目。

#題目

You are given two non-empty linked lists representing two non-negative integers. The digits are stored in reverse order and each of their nodes contain a single digit. Add the two numbers and return it as a linked list.

You may assume the two numbers do not contain any leading zero, except the number 0 itself.

Example

Input: (2 -> 4 -> 3) + (5 -> 6 -> 4)
Output: 7 -> 0 -> 8
Explanation: 342 + 465 = 807

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
/**
* Definition for singly-linked list.
* public class ListNode {
* public int val;
* public ListNode next;
* public ListNode(int x) { val = x; }
* }
*/
public class Solution {
public ListNode AddTwoNumbers(ListNode l1, ListNode l2) {

}
}

#解題

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
public class Solution
{
public ListNode AddTwoNumbers(ListNode l1, ListNode l2)
{
ListNode Result = new ListNode(0);

ListNode CN1 = l1;
ListNode CN2 = l2;

ListNode RCN = Result;
bool Flag = true;
while (Flag)
{
var Sum = RCN.val + GetNodeValue(CN1) + GetNodeValue(CN2);

RCN.val = Sum % 10;

if (Sum > 9)
RCN.next = new ListNode(1);

CN1 = CN1 == null ? null : CN1.next;
CN2 = CN2 == null ? null : CN2.next;


Flag = (CN1 != null || CN2 != null);

if (Flag && RCN.next == null)
RCN.next = new ListNode(0);

RCN = RCN.next;
}

return Result;
}

private int GetNodeValue(ListNode node)
{
return node == null ? 0 : node.val;
}
}

Unit Testing

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
[TestClass]
public class SolutionTests
{
[TestMethod]
public void AddTwoNumbersTest_輸入L1為342_L2為456_應得到807()
{
//arrange
var l1 = new ListNode(2);
l1.next = new ListNode(4);
l1.next.next = new ListNode(3);

var l2 = new ListNode(5);
l2.next = new ListNode(6);
l2.next.next = new ListNode(4);

var sut = new Solution();

var expected = new ListNode(7);
expected.next = new ListNode(0);
expected.next.next = new ListNode(8);
//act
var actual = sut.AddTwoNumbers(l1,l2);

//assert
actual.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expected);
}

[TestMethod]
public void AddTwoNumbersTest_輸入L1為42_L2為708_應得到750()
{
//arrange
var l1 = new ListNode(2);
l1.next = new ListNode(4);

var l2 = new ListNode(8);
l2.next = new ListNode(0);
l2.next.next = new ListNode(7);

var sut = new Solution();

var expected = new ListNode(0);
expected.next = new ListNode(5);
expected.next.next = new ListNode(7);
//act
var actual = sut.AddTwoNumbers(l1, l2);

//assert
actual.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expected);
}

[TestMethod]
public void AddTwoNumbersTest_輸入L1為1_L2為99_應得到100()
{
//arrange
var l1 = new ListNode(1);

var l2 = new ListNode(9);
l2.next = new ListNode(9);

var sut = new Solution();

var expected = new ListNode(0);
expected.next = new ListNode(0);
expected.next.next = new ListNode(1);
//act
var actual = sut.AddTwoNumbers(l1, l2);

//assert
actual.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expected);
}
}

#分析結果

雖然過了但是效率不佳,執行完LeetCode全部的測試總共花費 176 ms只贏過38.84%的提交範例,所以試試看優化它

/images/20180615/leetcode/1.jpg

移除三元運算子

基本上三元運算子比較耗效能,所以優先改進它

原本

1
2
3
4
private int GetNodeValue(ListNode node)
{
return node == null ? 0 : node.val;
}

修改後

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
private int GetNodeValue(ListNode node)
{
if (node == null)
{
return 0;
}

return node.val;
}

原本

1
2
CN1 = CN1 == null ? null : CN1.next;
CN2 = CN2 == null ? null : CN2.next;

修改後

1
2
3
4
5
if (Node1Cursor != null)
Node1Cursor = Node1Cursor.next;

if (Node2Cursor != null)
Node2Cursor = Node2Cursor.next;

測試結果

/images/20180615/leetcode/2.jpg

簡直是三元運算子定生死….

優化可讀性

乾淨的程式碼,閱讀起來應該像是幾何證明般

Uncle Bob

所以試著讓變數命名更貼近意義一點

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
public class Solution
{
public ListNode AddTwoNumbers(ListNode l1, ListNode l2)
{
ListNode Result = new ListNode(0);

ListNode Node1Cursor = l1;
ListNode Node2Cursor = l2;

ListNode Head = Result;
bool NeedNextRun = true;
while (NeedNextRun)
{
var Sum = Head.val + GetNodeValue(Node1Cursor) + GetNodeValue(Node2Cursor);

Head.val = Sum % 10;

if (Sum > 9)
Head.next = new ListNode(1);


if (Node1Cursor != null)
Node1Cursor = Node1Cursor.next;

if (Node2Cursor != null)
Node2Cursor = Node2Cursor.next;

NeedNextRun = (Node1Cursor != null || Node2Cursor != null);

if (NeedNextRun && Head.next == null)
Head.next = new ListNode(0);

Head = Head.next;
}

return Result;
}

private int GetNodeValue(ListNode node)
{
if (node == null)
{
return 0;
}

return node.val;
}
}

也因為有寫單元測試的關係,上述的調整過程中都沒讓程式壞掉,最後希望藉由這樣的練習能讓自己TDD與重構的技巧再更純熟一些